.png)
The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is a proposed bill in the United States aimed at addressing the growing concerns surrounding the safety of children and teenagers online.
The KOSA bill seeks to establish new regulations and requirements for online platforms to implement privacy and safety safeguards. The bill aims to prevent features that increase internet usage by minors, control personalized recommendation algorithms, and limit sharing of personal information provided by minors with other platform users. These include robust age-verification systems, content moderation protocols, and increased parental controls to protect minors.
However, the introduction of this bill has been met with significant controversy, as some argue that it could limit minors’ access to potentially vital resources, and violate the First Amendment by imposing content moderation by the government. The debate surrounding the KOSA bill highlights the delicate balance between safeguarding vulnerable young users and preserving the principles of a free and open internet.
Using the internet can cause more harm than good to minors
There are many risks to minors using the internet, for example, the exposure to inappropriate or harmful content. This can include things like violence, pornography, hate speech, and misinformation. Minors may come across this type of content while browsing the web, using social media, or playing online games. This exposure can be psychologically damaging, especially for young and impressionable minds. In addition there are also risks of minors being contacted by online predators who may try to groom them for abuse or exploitation. Predators can use the anonymity of the internet to more easily connect with and manipulate vulnerable children, causing devastating consequences.
Another major risk is the potential for cyberbullying and online harassment. Minors may be targeted by their peers through mean-spirited comments, threats, rumors, or the non consensual sharing of embarrassing content. This can have severe impacts on a child's self-esteem, mental health, and sense of safety. It is also extremely concerning that a minor's personal information and online activity could potentially be used by bad actors for identity theft, stalking, or other malicious purposes.
Learning from the evolution of privacy law
With the importance of introducing measures to keep children safe online, coupled with the controversies around the introduction of KOSA, and concerns around its ethics, let’s go back and take a look at the evolution of privacy laws to understand whether this bill will actually be effective at protecting children online.
The journey of privacy laws begins with the right to be left alone, a principle aimed at protecting individuals from unwarranted public scrutiny. This foundational concept set the stage for future justice by emphasizing the importance of individual autonomy. Early US data breach litigation reflected this, demanding tangible evidence of harm, such as financial loss or identity theft, for legal action. During this time legal action around privacy was defined by the necessity of concrete harm, a principle that would evolve as society's understanding of privacy deepened.
As privacy laws evolved, they began to address the more nuanced issue of surveillance, capturing the essence of being protected from the feeling of being watched. This shift towards protecting the intimate spaces of individuals' lives from external intrusion marked a significant step in doing future justice. The introduction of statutory damages in class action privacy litigation represented a critical evolution, where harm was presumed, acknowledging the intrinsic value of privacy beyond tangible losses.
Today, the focus of privacy litigation has expanded to encompass the preservation of autonomy. The practice of requesting consent using complex privacy policies illustrates how individuals are subtly coerced into choices that serve corporate interests, undermining their autonomy.
The success of privacy protection thus far owes much to the private market for enforcement. Without it, the pace of legal adaptation would lag significantly behind the rapid advancements in the digital world. The industry's response to privacy-preserving measures, despite technological advancements, highlights the persistent challenge of aligning law with technology. Doing the future justice requires exactly that. But we still have a long way to go, of course.
KOSA needs a private right of action
As we reflect on the evolution of privacy, it becomes clear that the path to doing future justice necessitates a robust framework for private enforcement. The current KOSA proposal, while a step in the right direction, falls short by omitting a private right of action. This omission overlooks the critical role that a market-driven mechanism for legal enforcement plays in ensuring that privacy laws keep pace with technological innovation.
To truly do the future justice, and keep minors safe online, we must advocate for a regulatory framework that not only addresses current challenges but is also agile enough to adapt to the unforeseen complexities of the digital age. By incorporating private enforcement, individuals and entities are empowered to hold corporations accountable, fostering a dynamic legal landscape that can effectively respond to the evolving nature of the world we live in.
Protecting the next generation
While the introduction of KOSA is welcomed, and we believe it is a well-intentioned effort to protect minors from the harms of the online world, the general consensus is that the legislation raises significant concerns around free speech and government overreach.
Drawing on insights from the evolution of privacy laws, we believe that for KOSA to be truly effective in safeguarding children online, it will need to incorporate a robust private right of action that empowers parents and children to enforce the law's provisions. Without such a mechanism, KOSA risks becoming yet another well-meaning but ultimately ineffective piece of legislation, leaving our youth exposed to the very dangers it was designed to address - and giving the government the power to moderate online content.
As policymakers continue to grapple with this challenge, they must strive to uphold the fundamental principles of free expression while also shielding the most vulnerable members of our society. Only through this careful and nuanced approach can we hope to create a safer digital landscape for our children to thrive in.
Want to find your next big case? Contact us.
_________________________
This Might Interest You:
Partner with Darrow to grow your practice
